This question lies at the heart of the reductionism versus holism debate. Specifically the focus in this post will be around the reductionist side of the argument, analysing the benefits and drawbacks of this approach, alongside the role it has played in Psychology as an academic discipline.
What is the Definition of Reductionism?
Reductionism in Psychology refers to explaining behaviour and internal mental processes by breaking them down into simpler components, rather than taking all facets of the behaviour into account. There are multiple different branches of reductionism, such as biological reductionism, environmental reductionism, machine reductionism, and more.
The opposite of reductionism is holism. Holism argues that a behaviour should not be explained via fundamental constituents, instead it should acknowledge multiple factors and how they interact. For example, a holistic explanation for aggression would combine factors such as genetics, thought processes, past trauma, and current life stressors.
Examples of Reductionism?
An example of biological reductionism would be explaining behaviour via a biological source, such as a genetic variation. For example, aggressive behaviour may be attributed to a dysfunctional MAOA gene, which is a simplified component and ignores the role of other influential factors. This biologically reductionist approach disregards the role that environment, cognition, and socio-cultural factors likely have in outcomes, such as aggressive behaviour.
Environmental reductionism occurs when researchers attempt to explain behaviour via external environmental influences while ignoring the role of other factors, e.g. biology and cognition. A good example of this is phobia development. The reductionist approach suggests that the phobia is learned via a stimulus-response blueprint, which ignores the uniqueness of each individual and how they may respond to specific events throughout life.
Another example of reductionism can be seen in cognitive psychology. Machine reductionism refers to the concept of understanding a complex internal system/behaviour by making direct comparisons to the components of a machine. A good example of this is memory being compared to a computer model. For example, the long-term memory and a hard drive, as they can both store large amounts of data for long periods. This approach may be useful, however it is overly simplistic as it fails to account for other variables, e.g. emotional and social factors, which may also play a role in how information is stored.
What are the Positives of the Reductionist Approach?
On first glance the majority of readers would think that the reductionist approach is inferior to the holistic approach as it is overly simplistic and unreflective of human behaviour. On the other hand, reductionism has many benefits which makes it a very useful approach to use in psychological research.
The main benefit of reductionism is that it has scientific rigour, the breaking down of complicated behaviours means that they can be tested in a scientific way. This provides an advantage over the holistic approach as researchers may find it hard to isolate variables and assess which factors are most influential in the specific behaviour.
In addition, the reductionist approach has great practical application for the development of therapies and treatments. For example, the breaking down of mental health conditions to a sole explanation, such as serotonin imbalance, has allowed for the development of SSRIs which have been proven to be highly effective.
What are the Negatives of the Reductionist Approach?
As mentioned previously, a common issue with the reductionist approach is that it is overly simplistic which means that it may not be reflective of human behaviour, which is complex and unpredictable. As a result, the holistic approach may be superior as it provides a more nuanced explanation of human behaviour, which is more applicable to everyday life.
Another issue with reductionism is that much of the research into isolated variables uses highly controlled laboratory experiments. The main issue with the use of laboratory experiments is that they may be unreflective of how human beings actually operate in the real world, due to the artificial setting/tasks. For example, a task such as recalling a list of irrelevant words has limited personal salience, hence the behaviour reflected in the experiment may not be fully representative.
Conclusion of Reductionist Approaches in Psychology
Reductionist approaches and explanations certainly have their flaws, however reductionism has helped Psychology substantially in terms of developing as a scientific academic discipline. The absence of reductionism would make it difficult to determine cause-effect relationships between variables and behaviour, and without it certain treatments/therapies would not exist. Hence, there is no doubt that this approach is useful, however it should be used with caution to avoid over simplifying behaviour to a point at which the explanation is extreme and unrealistic.
No comments:
Post a Comment